There was a time in this Country when most people were ashamed or embarrassed to take government handouts. Families were too proud to admit that they could not get by on their own. My how times have changed! Yes there are still those who look at handouts as a last resort but there are those that look at government assistance as their right or something they have earned simply by being a citizen. I believe the truly needy should still get assistance but we need to do something about those people (and I know you know some) who make government assistance their chosen life style.
Let me be more specific….lets talk about unemployment compensation. Why should able bodied citizens receive tax money and do nothing for it? I am not talking about those who are on workman’s compensation (although that’s another abused source in some instances) but those citizens who have been laid off or fired due to cutbacks or a problem with their previous employer. I am not advocating ending this temporary source of income for the unemployed but merely asking that we the tax payer get something in return for our money.
Why don’t we insist that those who can work but have no job (temporarily) be put to work for the government in exchange for their weekly check. After all this is a diverse group with many skills who because of the economy have lost their previous job and are searching for a new way to benefit from their skills.
Let’s have the State of Illinois give a list to the cities where these folks live and require that the City of residence verify that they do work in exchange for their checks. There are countless jobs that cities could use the extra help on. I have continually heard that we can’t afford to hire additional staff (and I agree) and that because of that many projects are left undone.
Think of all the things we could accomplish in our city with additional help…cleaner parks,cleaner streets,planting of flowers in areas which are overridden with weeds, just to name a few. And we don’t have to limit it to unskilled jobs, after all we have a diverse group of unemployed in our area. We could use the extra help in engineering for road projects, traffic control near schools,as well as additional eyes for speeders in residential areas. Office staffs could catch up on backlogged paper work and schools would have additional cafeteria staff as well as hall monitors! Our full time permanent help could work in vacation time and we would not be short handed while they are gone.
Those who fill these jobs albeit temporarily, would have pride in giving something back to their fellow taxpayers in exchange for their pay.
I know what your thinking…..but Garry what about the unions? They don’t want to lose these potential jobs or see their members laid off….relax. We would have plenty of work for those already employed, in fact we could guarantee no layoffs in exchange for the additional help. It would not raise the cost of government because we are already paying these folks while they are unemployed. We would not work them 40 hours a week and we would allow them time to search for new employment during this temporary period. In fact, they would be opening up new avenues to network for contacts and leads by being out there publicly every day.
I want to know what you think….isn’t this a win win situation? Its better then what the WPA program was back in the day! And it would also give new incentive for that small portion of the unemployed who use this compensation annually for a 2-3 month vacation from work.
Do you think any government official down in Springfield has the intestinal fortitude to bring this up for debate in the General Assembly? They’d get my vote for re-election…..and I ‘ll bet yours….


